Practice Direction No. 54

Back to list of Practice Directions

Pilot E-Filing Project

Printer friendly version

Introduction

Registered users

Non-registered users

Security of passwords

Electronic filing system

Submission of a specified document to the court

Form of specified documents

Endorsements on specified documents

Documents incapable of conversion to electronic form

Hard copy documents

Subpoenas

Lodgement and service of documents

Judgment in default

File inspection and procurement of paper copies of documents

Amendment of specified documents

Copy documents for use by the trial judge

Hearings

Court e-mail addresses and facsimile numbers

Annexure A        Terminology

                            Functional principles

                            Technical guidelines

                            Standards

 

Introduction

1.      The provisions of this Practice Direction apply only to actions conducted pursuant to the pilot e-filing project commissioned by the Court (“the pilot e-filing project”).

 

- top -

 

2.      The pilot e-filing project will commence on the 11th day of July 2005 ("the pilot commencement date"), utilising the existing Civil Case Management System (CCMS).

 

- top -

 

3.      The pilot e-filing project is a Web-based system which will enable practitioners, who register as users, by completing the appropriate template through the web site (and thereby commit themselves to payment of court fees by credit card or direct debit arrangements), to initiate new proceedings in electronic form.

 

- top -

 

Registered users

4.      Only practitioners may become registered users. There is no present limit on the number of practitioners who may register as users of the Web-based system. The only requirement, apart from making the necessary fiscal arrangements, is that practitioners have facilities which will enable them to access the CAA web site.

 

- top -

 

5.      (1)    All applications for registration must be made in relation to the L Code of the applicant and must nominate the P Code of each practitioner who is to be an authorised agent of the proposed registered user.

         (2)    Before operating within the EFS each such authorised agent will also be required to input a separate alpha/numeric password (consisting of not less than eight characters, one of which must be numeric, and not more than 20 characters) as a personal authorised electronic authentication code (AEAC) in respect of the P Code of that practitioner.

         (3)    It is the obligation of each registered user (the L Code holder), forthwith, to inform the CAA, through The Law Society by such means as the Registrar may from time to time direct, of any change in the particulars contained in the application to become a registered user and, specifically, of any change in the details of authorised agents (the P Code holders) who may operate on their account.

         (4)    Until receipt of notice of revocation of the nomination of a person as an authorised agent, such person shall be deemed to continue as the authorised agent of the registered user, who shall be bound by and responsible to the Court for the actions of the authorised agent (See SCR 1A.14 (3)).

         (5)    All transactions on the EFS on behalf of a registered user shall be initiated by an authorised agent, by the input of both the P Code and AEAC of that person. Such input will, for all purposes, conclusively establish the relevant authorised agent as the initiator of the transaction.

 

- top -

 

6.      (1)    Where an action is commenced by a registered user in electronic form:

(a)    the primary record of that file shall be in electronic form;

(b)    all documents thereafter filed in the matter, by any party, shall, subject to the Rules and the provisions of this Practice Direction, be in electronic format;

(c)     to the maximum extent possible, matters will be dealt with "on-screen" and with production of only the minimum amount of hardcopy material required;

(d)    the primary method of communication by registered practitioners with the Courts is to be through the CAA web site, in a manner conforming to technical standards from time to time promulgated by the Courts;

(e)    the reasonable requirements of litigants in person (including handicapped or disabled persons) and others not having the technical capacity of dealing with the Court electronically will be met by provision of appropriate registry counter facilities suitable for the needs of those concerned;

(f)      the input of documents into the electronic filing system developed by the Courts (“the EFS”) shall be by completing a template accessed through the CAA web site by registered users or uploading data to the CAA web site; and

(g)    documents shall be transferred into the Courts system on a daily batch basis.

 

- top -

 

Non-registered users

7.      Where it is impractical for a party, or the legal representative of the party, to become a registered user, any document to be filed by the party or his or her legal representative shall be in electronic format on diskette and brought to the registry for uploading, or shall be scanned into the electronic file at the registry from a hardcopy suitable for that purpose.

 

- top -

 

8.      (1)    Upon presentation of the first document for electronic filing in proceedings by a person who is not a registered user, the Registrar shall cause such person to be allocated a unique, computer generated Personal Identification Number (PIN), and shall require that person to input into the EFS a separate, confidential alpha/numeric password (consisting of not less than eight characters, one of which must be numeric, and not more than 20 characters) as a personal authorised electronic authentication code (AEAC) in respect of the allocated PIN.

         (2)    No document may be filed by such person in the proceedings unless it is first authenticated by that person typing in his or her PIN, together with the last mentioned AEAC. Where more than one document is filed on the same occasion it shall only be necessary for the person to provide authentication once in respect of all the transactions.

         (3)    By so authenticating the document the person in question warrants that he or she has personally viewed the document on screen, is satisfied that it has been uploaded in the form desired and authorises the filing of it in that form.

         (4)    Upon release into the EFS, a document so authenticated shall be capable of read only access and may not thereafter be capable of alteration. It may, however, be withdrawn by the party authenticating it by leave of the Court. Any amendment of an authenticated document may only be made in the manner prescribed by SCR 53.02.

         (5)    Documents presented by a non-registered user at the Registry in electronic form for filing must comply with the following technical requirements:–

(a)    The documents must be stored in the following types of portable media:–

(i)      1.44 Mb 3 1/2 inch floppy diskettes

(ii)     CD-ROM

(b)    The electronic format of the documents must be: –

(i)      Microsoft Word 98

(ii)     Microsoft Word 2000

(iii)    PDF

(iv)    TIFF (except files using LZW compression)

(c)     The portable media submitted must be labelled with the name of the person presenting them and the file names of the documents contained therein. Unnamed or illegibly named diskettes or other media will be rejected by the Registry.

(d)    Each set of portable media given to the Registry must contain only the documents included in the submission.

(e)    The non-registered user must warrant to the Registry that any portable media presented are virus free and all relevant files are otherwise free of corruption.

(f)      The portable media submitted will be returned to the person filing when the contents have been processed into the EFS.

(g)    Bills of costs shall be submitted in a spreadsheet format, approved by the Registrar.

 

- top -

 

Security of passwords

9.      All AEACs shall conform to the technical requirements specified from time to time by the Registrar.

 

- top -

 

Electronic filing system

10.    The pilot e-filing project may, as from the pilot commencement date, be accessed through the CAA web site at www.courts.sa.gov.au.  To effect access, the cursor should be positioned on "e lodgement" under the subheading "Courts".

 

- top -

 

11.    Principles, guidelines and standards are set out in Annexure A.

 

- top -

 

Submission of a specified document to the court

12.    For the purposes of SCR1A, ‘specified document’ means:

·               summons

·               notice of address for service

·              application

·              pleadings

·              praecipe and subpoena

·              copy documents for use of the trial judge

·              orders, judgments and minutes thereof

·              notice of appeal

·              outline of submissions

·              list of documents

·              chronology

·              interrogatories

·              notice to admit and response thereto

·              statement of loss

·              bill of costs

·              any other document required by the Rules of Court to be filed in the proceedings.

 

- top -

 

13.    (1)    Specified documents and affidavits may be submitted by or on behalf of a registered user to the Court using the EFS at any time on any day on which the EFS is operational.  In the case of specified documents attracting payment of a fee, filing will not be processed other than between 9.00am and 4.30pm Monday–Friday, until further notice.

         (2)    Specified documents on diskette or in hardcopy and affidavits to be filed by a non-registered user may only be presented during hours in which the registry is normally open for business, unless the Registrar shall otherwise direct in a particular case.

 

- top -

 

Form of specified documents

14.    (1)    Subject to the provisions of Rule 3.07(2), all specified documents proposed to be filed through or presented at the Registry for entry into the EFS shall be in the form prescribed by the First Schedule to the Supreme Court Rules ("the First Schedule"), with the modifications specified in this paragraph.

         (2)    All specified documents, including the first page of the document shall, as far as possible, be and print out in hard copy in A4 size.

         (3)    Paragraph numbering of each document in a filing should be sequential, commencing with “1” in each instance.

         (4)    The layout of the first page should conform to Form 1 of the First Schedule. The first page of the document must contain the following details:–

(a)    the P Code of the authorised agent of the registered user, or the personal identification number (PIN) allocated to the filing party, where that party is not a registered user;

(b)    the e-mail address of the person submitting the document;

(c)     the facsimile address of such person;

(d)    the telephone contact number of such person; and

(e)    the postal and DX address of that person.

         (5)    Provision is to be made for a field on the top of the first page of each document submitted, in which the sequential identification number of the document within a file (“the file document number” or “FDN”) may be inserted.

         (6)    The title or description of each document, as appearing on the first page of it, shall be reproduced at the top of each subsequent page. Where relevant, it shall (as appropriate) include reference to the party making it, or on behalf of whom it is to be filed.

         (7)    The EFS will ultimately contain electronic templates for all forms in the First Schedule. These may be used for document data input purposes. In the short term, not all templates will be available.  Where a specific template is not currently available, Form 45 should be utilised for input purposes.  Provided that a practitioner’s practice management system can supply data in a format conforming with LegalXML, it will be possible for data to be loaded direct from such system into the EFS using the bulk lodgement facility, as alternative to keying in such data in to the electronic templates.

 

- top -

 

Endorsements on specified documents

15.    Where it is necessary, in conformity with the Rules or a direction of the Court, to include endorsements on any specified document: –

(1)    If an endorsement can be made prior to the filing or issue of the document, that endorsement shall be incorporated into the document before it is issued or filed.

(2)    If an endorsement must be made on a document which has already been filed or issued, a fresh copy of that document containing the relevant endorsement shall be prepared and the document must be re-filed or re-issued, as the case may be.

 

- top -

 

Documents incapable of conversion to electronic form

16.    In the case of documents which, in whole or in part, cannot, for technical reasons, be directly converted into a readable electronic form by scanning, the following directions shall apply: -

         (1)    The originals of any such document MUST physically be lodged in the Registry.

         (2)    A copy of the entire document, including any parts that can directly be converted into an electronic form and those that cannot be so converted, must be produced in a form which is capable of being effectively scanned. That copy is to be scanned in a format compatible with and submitted through the EFS for filing. It is to be endorsed at the top “COPY OF ORIGINAL LODGED IN REGISTRY”.

         (3)    An appropriate scanner will be available in the Registry to meet the needs of any party who does not otherwise have reasonable access to scanning facilities compatible with the EFS.

 

- top -

 

Hard copy documents

17.    (1)    The Registrar may, at any time, request a party to supply the registry with hard copies of any documents filed electronically.

         (2)    Upon such request the filing party or his or her legal representative shall supply hard copies of the relevant documents within such reasonable time frame as specified by the Registrar.

         (3)    The Registrar may also direct that any or all specified documents in proceedings be filed in hard copy, instead of using the EFS for such period or periods as the Registrar may nominate.

 

- top -

 

Subpoenas

18.    Applications for the issue of subpoenas will continue to be by way of praecipe (Form 25). A proposed subpoena and the related praecipe will be submitted to the Registry through the EFS. If in order, the subpoena will be authenticated electronically and then transmitted electronically to the registered user requesting it. The registered user may then print off hard copies for service. The praecipe will be filed separately and allocated an FDN. A praecipe and subpoena may be submitted at the Registry, by a person who is not a registered user, in hard copy capable of being scanned. In such case the documents will be processed by Registry staff into the EFS and the requisite number of hard copies of the subpoena will be printed and supplied to the applicant for them.

 

- top -

 

Lodgement and service of documents

19.    (1)    Upon receipt of a specified document or an affidavit into CCMS, a computer generated acknowledgment of such receipt and of the time and date thereof will be transmitted to the party sending it, in accordance with SCR 1A.17 (3).

         (2)    The notification of receipt referred to in (1) above will, as appropriate to the circumstances, indicate the file and file document number, the date and time of filing and the date and time allocated for any related hearing. A copy of such notification shall be attached, by either electronic or manual means, to any copy of the document before it is served on any party.

 

- top -

 

Judgment in default

20.    A party wishing to enter a judgment in default of the filing of a notice of address for service or a defence may do so by transmitting to the Registrar an e-mail request to enter such judgment, together with a proposed form of judgment for settling in electronic form. Such request shall identify those documents upon which the applicant relies as the basis for the entry of judgment and, itself, be filed as a document in the proceedings.

 

- top -

 

File inspection and procurement of paper copies of documents

21.    (1)    Subject to any specific direction by a Judge or Master and the development of the technical facility to support such access, a registered user will be entitled to read only access to any file on which that user has filed a document. The user may also, subject to any such direction and development, download a paper copy of any of the content of such file.

         (2)    A registered user may, by e-mail request to the Registrar explaining the reason for it, seek read only access to any other specified file. If the Registrar is satisfied that the request is in accordance with section 131 of the Supreme Court Act or section 54 of the District Court Act (as the case may be), access and the right to copy will be granted by such means and subject to such conditions as the Registrar shall stipulate.

         (3)    Any other person may apply to the Registrar, at the Registry, for permission to search a specified file. If the Registrar is satisfied that such request is in accordance with section 131 of the Supreme Court Act or section 54 of the District Court Act (as the case may be) approval (or conditional approval) will be granted. Registry staff will, upon payment of any prescribed fee, assign a personal computer and associated printer to the inspecting party to enable the inspection to be carried out in accordance with the terms of the approval.

         (4)    Certified true paper copies of documents will be issued by the Registrar to any person who demonstrates a proper reason for requesting them. Such issue may be by request, by electronic or paper means, directed to the proper officer in the Registry.

         (5)    In the event that access to any document on an electronic file may properly be restricted, such restriction shall be coded on the relevant portion of the file, so as to prevent access in accordance with that restriction.

         (6)    The foregoing subparagraphs are to be read subject to (and are not intended to be in extension of) the provisions of section 131 of the Supreme Court Act 1935 and section 54 of the District Court Act 1991. They are subject to the terms of any suppression order which may be made pursuant to Part VIII of the Evidence Act 1929.

 

- top -

 

Amendment of specified documents

22.    Attention is drawn to the provisions of SCR 53.02 which specify the method by which specified documents are to be amended.

 

- top -

 

Copy documents for use by the trial judge

23.    (1)    Any copy documents for use at a hearing (where required) and (where produced) all written opening addresses or materials, outlines or submissions must be delivered to the Court by transmission in electronic format through the EFS, or otherwise in an electronic format medium, unless the Court shall otherwise direct in a particular case. Facilities provided in the Registry may be utilised for that purpose by non-registered users.

         (2)    The following directions are applicable to all copy documents or other materials provided for the use of the trial Judge:–

(a)    Index pages shall be prepared. However, it will not be necessary to include the page number reference in the index.

(b)    In addition to such index pages, where the index refers to more than one document within a single Portable Document Format (PDF) file in a bundle, a bookmark should be created in that PDF file for each such reference in the index. There should be as many bookmarks in that PDF file as there are references in the index to documents in that PDF file.

(c)     The bookmarking should be effected using the bookmarking function provided in an approved program.

(d)    The name given to each bookmark should be the same as the corresponding reference in the index.

(e)    If a bundle of documents includes:

(i)   more than one PDF document;

(ii) a number of references to file document numbers and also PDF documents; or

(iii)    a number of references to file document number,

then the various PDF documents or file document number references, as the case may be, should be arranged chronologically or in some logical order.

(f)      The index should act as a hyperlink to each document to which it refers.

 

- top -

 

Hearings

24.    (1)    Unless the presiding judicial officer otherwise directs, hearings involving affidavits and specified documents, whether in open Court or in Chambers, will be conducted in an electronic environment. This will be related to the progressive equipping of courts to enable that to be done.

         (2)    Practitioners will be given appropriate read only access to the electronic court file at the start of the hearing, by the Judge or Master conducting the hearing.

         (3)    Practitioners should use the facility provided to access and navigate around the relevant electronic case file. The Judge or Master, and other counsel, should be referred to relevant documents using the appropriate switching devices or links. Counsel may bring their paper copies of documents to Court for their own reference, but these may not be tendered to the Court, save as otherwise provided in this paragraph. If counsel bring electronic copies of their documents, these may not normally be loaded into the Court’s personal computer. Instead, these should be read using counsel’s own notebook or other computer.

         (4)    In the event that a practitioner closes down the computer access facility provided in the course of the hearing for any reason, the legal practitioner in question may need to ask the Judge or Master to give that person fresh access to the case file in question.

         (5)    At the end of the hearing, or if the hearing is halted for any significant length of time, representatives of parties should close down the access facility provided. This will prevent unauthorised access to the electronic case file. If the facility is not closed down, it will be possible for persons not involved in the case to peruse the documents contained in the electronic case file.

         (6)    In the event that a practitioner wishes to refer to case files other than those which have been fixed for hearing, the practitioner should make a request to the Registrar for access to the case file at least one clear day before the day fixed for the hearing.

         (7)    All affidavits and specified documents for use at any hearing (including outlines and copy authorities) should be filed, using the EFS, at least one clear day in advance of the hearing. In the event that it is not reasonably possible to so file the documents in advance of the hearing, counsel may apply to the Judge or Master conducting the hearing for leave to use paper documents. Counsel will be required to justify non compliance with the normal procedures envisaged by this Practice Direction and will normally be asked to give an undertaking to file all such documents in the EFS by the next working day after the hearing. Any document not filed using the EFS will not be included in the Court’s case record.

 

- top -

 

Court e-mail addresses and facsimile numbers

25.    The approved email addresses for the registries of the Courts are:

                   Supreme Court         supreme.registry@courts.sa.gov.au

                   District Court            district.civil@courts.sa.gov.au

 

          The approved facsimile numbers for the registries of the Courts are:

                   Supreme Court         (08) 8212 7154

                   District Court            (08) 8204 0544.

 

- top -

 

 

 

 

 

DATED this 1st day of July 2005

                                                                                   

 

(Edie Bransbury)

REGISTRAR

SUPREME COURT

 

- top -